Jackie Bowring: Melancholy and the Landscape.

East Budleigh Common, 2020, Andy Thatcher.

Melancholy is a neglected, maligned and misunderstood word. There’s something distinctly archaic about it, with a whiff of Byronic Romantic excess. It’s also collapsed with milder forms of depression and thus suffers the cultural fear of contagion which still, alas, accompanies conceptions of mental illness and fragility. It is, to some extent, both of these things, but is also much more than that. Melancholy is an innately pleasurable form of sadness – think of Allegri’s Miserere, Love’s Forever Changes, the paintings of Edward Hopper, the haiku of Shiki. It is a productive, not an overwhelming sadness, for in melancholy one can contemplate and begin to resolve difficult feelings, such as grief, loss, despair, loneliness, or simply the ultimate transience of that which is good. In a contemporary culture slavishly obsessed with happiness, whatever that might mean, the Melancholy is both devalued and conversely, given the rising rates of depression and anxiety, more necessary than ever. 

Jacky Bowring’s Melancholy in the Landscape (2017) examines the different forms though which melancholy is expressed in landscape from the urban to the wilderness. While concentrating on landscape architecture, Bowring also addresses the visual arts, including photography. Her central argument is that melancholy needs to be considered alongside and interdependent with the Picturesque, the Beautiful and the Sublime as drawing on the same cultural and historic wellspring; in essence, she argues, we need to speak in terms of the Melancholy. It is crucial in parsing these terms to consider their affective differences, for while the Beautiful leans towards the joyful and transcendent, the Picturesque to a pleasing sense of worldly order, the Sublime to awe and terror, the Melancholy, according to Edmund Burke, in music emphasises ‘that melting, that sinking, that languor’. (28) The Melancholy thus, according to Karen Till (39) speaking of Holocaust memorials, carefully opens up a ‘wound’ to permit difficult emotions to emerge in a safe space; to this extent, it could therefore be said the Melancholy provides a valuable therapeutic function without proposing a cure. Speaking of Sontag’s discussion of the anaesthetising effects of overexposure to human suffering, Bowring also argues that the Melancholy, through its subtlety, engages and makes possible an empathetic engagement with the suffering of others (43).

Bowring sets out this argument eloquently and persuasively in Part 1; in Part 2, she sets out a taxonomy of expressions of the Melancholy. Bowring’s taxonomy overlaps to no small extent with Mark Fisher’s (2016) parsing of the Weird and the Eerie from the Uncanny (see earlier post on this). Certainly, all three make possible the Melancholy, and indeed the Uncanny is included here specifically. I have found Bowring’s taxonomy extraordinary with regards to my own practice, as here is set out the overwhelming majority of my stylistic, affective, and contextual drive as a photographer. This is to some extent unsurprising, as I have struggled with varying forms of anxiety and depression throughout my life since my mid-teens. I have sought out music, art, films, literature – and photography – which neither makes me confront the terrors of these emotions, nor escape them, but to permit me to dwell in them and thus find consolation and, to some extent, a resolution. It thus makes sense to address how I see this taxonomy reflected in my work, and to demonstrate this, I will make use of a single photo shoot, at East Budleigh Common, in the evening of June 14th of this year. 

East Budleigh Common, 2020, Andy Thatcher.

The Void implies an absence due to abandonment, and thus loss, and Bowring evaluates commemorative memorials which make use of empty chairs including scenic benches and an installation dedicated to the victims of the Christchurch earthquake of 2011. I have become fascinated with the many den structures found across the Pebblebed Heaths and photographed them often, though have largely been dissatisfied with the results. My interest is in part their interesting geometries, the angles and triangular shapes a deep contrast with the woodland around them, but it is also that they imply the hands which built them and the bodies which inhabited them. This is made all the more poignant for the dens’ connection with childhood and parenthood, a period of life itself characterised by transience and eventual loss. 

East Budleigh Common, 2020, Andy Thatcher.

Bowring simplifies The Uncanny as making the familiar strange, with or without doubling, and this is something that informs much of my work. I have become a little obsessed with the strange, tentacular structures which parasitic vines leave on trees, and which remind me of horror writers such as H.P. Lovecraft and Spielberg’s derided but rather wonderful War of the Worlds. Woodland is, culturally and affectively, often a weird place, and this is part of its appeal. My recurrent shots of these vines reflect this; that woodlands, often considered life-giving and even therapeutic in the case of shinrin-yoku, might also be sinister, even hostile. 

East Budleigh Common, 2020, Andy Thatcher.

Shadows and darkness can be horrific in the sense of the Sublime, but they can also be merely threatening, or simply unsettling. They imply absence, defamiliarisation and the loss of certainty, of sensory competency, and of the things one holds dear. Metaphorically, they already signify melancholy and sadness – the darkening of mood, the dark pit of despair. In this shot of a beech tree, the tree is almost a silhouette, the absent lush, vibrant green of the leaves and moss almost teasingly suggested by the ferns behind, the darkened crevices of the trunk seemingly reptilian. 

East Budleigh Common, 2020, Andy Thatcher.

Liminality can be expressed in a variety of ways and liminal spaces have been the subject of previous work of mine. I’m interested in entranceways, meeting points, passages, and ‘edgeland’ areas, and gates and border areas continue to feature in my work on the commons. The passage from one state to another suggests transience and the anxiety of indeterminacy. In the case of twilight, this also suggests death and like darkness and shadows, this draws on deeply-ingrained cultural and mythological iterations. I’ve long been drawn to photograph over the long summer evenings, once the golden light reddens and especially in the otherworldly turquoises and purples following sunset. This image is itself a liminal space, a triangular road junction of unused land, at a liminal moment. The empty roads further accentuate the melancholy mood here. 

East Budleigh Common, 2020, Andy Thatcher.

Fragments in the form of ruins are one of the most familiar features of Picturesque landscape paintings and are associated with Sublime forms such as the Gothic. They are themselves liminal, poised between a complete structure and their inevitable, eventual complete destruction, and this infers transience and loss. Cognitively, their incompletion prompts their imaginative reconstruction, and doing so suggests the limits of knowledge just as it does, by comparison, the sadness of their degraded state. All lives have their ruins – ruined marriages, ruined childhoods, ruined Christmases, ruined opportunities – and contemplating ruins outside of the Picturesque and the Sublime makes possible an empathic self-evaluation. This gate indicates a ruined intention, a failure to assert power. 

East Budleigh Common, 2020, Andy Thatcher.

Leavings, what become for the artist ‘found objects’, are another favourite theme of my work, and indeed are things I have collected over the years. Unlike the dens, a ‘leaving’ suggests a need for its return to its owner as if it were a ‘phantom limb’. Leavings have not been abandoned but lost, forgotten and mislaid. They imply narratives and the people who left them there. Such things are, according to Margaret Gibson, ‘stranded objects’ (119) and according to Bowring ‘outside time and space’ which ‘prevent closure’. This image is the only one taken prior to the shoot, although only by a few days. It is a primary school leaver’s shirt, itself a poignant, melancholic object, communicating loss, transience and the uncertainty of the unknown. The sadness I felt in encountering it was tangibly real, and I hoped whoever had left it there did not miss it so very terribly. I felt a powerful yearning, itself a melancholy mood, to return it. 

East Budleigh Common, 2020, Andy Thatcher.

Submersion, whether by water, sand, plants or otherwise, is a liminal state of a particular order. It ‘confounds boundaries’ (137) and suggests the unstoppable forces which lead towards the extinction of all. This being so, submersion resonates with apocalyptic tropes. There’s an ambiguity to the World War II ruins at East Budleigh Common for, on the one hand they are a reminder of conflicts past, but on the other, are evidence of the transience of the man-made, and in particular of the masculine of which the military is emblamatic.

East Budleigh Common, 2020, Andy Thatcher.

Weathering and patina are similar to, but quite different to fragmentation and submersion, for they retain intact the traces of what they once were and are in the process of erasure and becoming other; like memories, they are fading. Faded artwork lacks the Gothic overtones of the ruin, the apocalyptic of submersion, but rather theirs is the sadness of neglect, heavy with regret. I’ve been particularly drawn to the faded graffiti on the old bunkers, more so than the fresh, vibrant recent work. This artwork is not created to last, and indeed is often painted on top of other artwork, but nevertheless the lack of vitality suggests the decrepitude of old age rather than the death of submersion or ruin. Weathering reveals not a change of state but the object itself in the process of disintegration.

I am deepening an awareness of my subjective response to the Pebblebed Heaths in preparation for better learning about the subjective experiences of others. This process has been both surprising and productive, for it has connected this landscape to my sense of self and personal history in a profound way. 

Bowring, J. 2017. Melancholy and the Landscape: Locating Sadness, Memory and Reflection in the Landscape. London: Routledge. 

Fisher, M. 2016. The Weird and the Eerie. London: Repeater. 

Christopher Neve: Unquiet Landscape – Places and Ideas in 20th-Century British Painting.

I read this book at the height of lockdown, recommended by a landscape photographer. This was a time when I ached for landscape to connect with, having briefly lost my own landscapes, both present and past, and so sought the landscapes available on foot from home. It’s a book about individual connections with landscape by mid-20th century British landscape painters, some very well-known like Paul Nash and Eric Ravilious, and some less celebrated. And it’s also a deeply philosophical and personal statement by Neve, a gallery owner who knew all the artists personally, concerning how artists in particular connect with landscapes, why they do it, and what effect this liberates. 

Neve advocates for an engaged but dispassionate – he uses the word ‘objective’, though not in the strictly scientific sense – observation, unclouded by sentiment or imposition, which allows for a set of feelings to arise which liberates an imaginative engagement. The painting arises from that engagement. Speaking of William Townsend, Neve says 

‘Knowing how to see, how to approach the whole business of seeing, without prejudice or self-consciousness, can be the very basis on which to feel… Accurate observation arouses the imagination. To have these feelings, you do not observe countryside in a general way; you study it’. (136).

The Hop Garden, 1950, William Townsend.

Each artist is motivated in doing so by their circumstances, personal histories and temperaments, and the feelings which arise are where self becomes entangled with landscape, is acted on by it. Speaking of L. S. Lowry, Neve comments…

‘You can always tell when a painter is in the business of artifice, of setting scenes instead of showing you what he really feels… To draw dramatic scenery as though it carries some meaning of its own is one thing: to sense its connection with your own terror of loneliness is another.’ (139-140).

The Landmark, 1936, L. S. Lowry.

In Eric Ravilious, he identifies a playful sense of geometry indistinguishable from his work in graphic design and textiles; in Stanley Spencer, a non-discriminating, ‘act of love’ through intense scrutiny which draws on a profound Christian faith; in Joan Eardley an elemental and pared-back solitude. To Neve, landscape has no specific ‘meaning’, but it finds expression by acting on the artist so long as they let it do so by stepping back and letting it work through them in such a way that the viewer may also engage with it – and through – the artist’s interpretation, in which we may find reflections of our own preferences and needs. 

Here is not the place to discuss how this reflects my research into cultural geographers such as Wylie, Ingold and Massey, and anthropologist Tilley – doing this justice would run into many thousands of words – but it is enough for me to say that I see here the sense of entanglement and dwelling in the landscape which they refer to. I also see here reflected my previous experiences of artistic connections with landscapes. What is different here is that Neve is talking about a long-term, often life-long commitment to a landscape, something not really possible on five shoots spread out over months. And this is why it’s so timely, as Covid-19 has forced me into a position where I’m becoming as deeply immersed in a particular landscape – the Pebblebed Heaths – as are the ticks which I sometimes bring home. 

Kettle Plantation, 2020, Andy Thatcher.

It’s also timely because, on the new module, Surfaces and Strategies, I’m more interested in a subjective, sensory, imaginative encounter with landscape, my own and those of others, and that’s why I’m increasingly asking myself the question: what does this landscape draw from me other than my interest? What am I drawn to and why? I’ve mentioned previously that I’m drawn to the weird and the eerie in landscape, and this is in no small measure because I’ve an active imagination and I love sci-fi and horror, but that doesn’t sufficiently explain why it’s the strange corners and valleys that interest me the most, the ruins and damage. I believe it’s a result of an unhappy and lonely childhood spent escaping into books; my encounter with landscape has always been exactly that kind of escape, a desire to find that same release and sense of possibility in the physical world ‘out there’, the affirmation that provides, and a space in which difficult feelings can find resolution.

Uphams Plantation, 2020, Andy Thatcher.

I’ve begun to speak of walking on the heaths at the end of the day as a ‘reverie’ and I think that’s more or less the kind of dispassionate observation Neve refers to. It’s certainly informed by an attention to detail and knowledge; it’s vital for me to understand why the landscape looks as it does, politically, historically, ecologically, culturally, but that, I now see, assists the reverie. I can know that the churring of the nightjars I hear is exactly what it is, but I can also enter into the otherworldly feelings those inspire in me and create work through imaginative engagement. During Informing Contexts, I asked ‘What are the Pebblebed Heaths?’ During Surfaces and Strategies, I’m asking ‘What are the Pebblebed Heaths to me?’ 

Neve, C. 2019. Unquiet Landscape: Places and Ideas in 20th-Century British Painting (2nd edition). London: Thames and Hudson. 

Me, my practice, and I.

My practice is an exploration of place, especially the interaction of the human, the vegetal and the geological. With a background in film and writing, I’m interested in the possibilities of sequencing and incorporating text, and since beginning this Masters, I have developed a strong appreciation of the photobook as a means to explore and express places. My critical background draws on work in film and literature and includes a keen interest in cultural geography and environmental psychology, as well as critics Rebecca Solnit, Liz Wells and Jacky Bowring. The focus of my work, within the restrictions of the CV-19 pandemic, is an area of registered common land close to my home in Exeter, the Pebblebed Heaths. I’ve been photographing it and learning about it for several years and am getting to know those connected with it both personally and for their livelihoods.